Oct
15

Better irrigation in greenhouses and nurseries saves both money and water


The US greenhouse and nursery industry supplies consumers with ornamental plants, vegetable seedlings, and fruit trees for use in gardens throughout North America. Irrigation in greenhouses and nurseries can be difficult to manage, because many of the plants are grown in fairly small pots that may need to be watered several times per day. And most greenhouse and nurseries grow a wide variety of crops; adjusting irrigation of all these crops based on the actual watering needs is too time-consuming for growers.
To address this challenge, we have developed wireless sensor networks to help growers automate irrigation based on the actual water needs of their crops. The principle is simple: soil moisture sensors are inserted into the pots and they measure how much water is present. The sensors are connected to a ‘node’, which radios the data to a computer, where the data is presented in charts. Growers can see whether the various crops have adequate water. More importantly, they can use this computer to instruct each node when and for how long to turn on the irrigation. This way, plants get watered only when needed and only with the amount of water required.
We are testing this system in a commercial nursery in Georgia. For the testing, we decided to pick gardenia ‘Radicans’, one of the most challenging crops produced by this nursery. Typically, this nursery loses about 20 – 30% of the plants during the production, and most of these losses are due to watering too much.
Using the wireless sensor networks to automate the irrigation of this crop eliminated these losses. And just as importantly, we found that we could actually grow the crop much faster; the normal production cycle for these plants is 14 months, but with precision irrigation we were able to grow them in only eight months.
The precision irrigation had various benefits to the nursery: since none of the plants died because of overwatering, the nursery could sell 2,000 more plants than they anticipated. And shortening the production cycle from 14 to 8 months reduced the production inputs (labor, fertilizer, pesticides). Combined, the extra plants that were sold and the reduced production costs resulted in an economic gain of $20,700 or approximately $1/sq. ft. The required hardware only costs about $6,000, so the return on investment was just a few months.
This research not only benefited this nursery, but also society at large: by irrigation more precisely, the nursery withdraws les ground water, leaving more water for other uses. And after seeing the benefits of better irrigation practices, the nursery has adjusted their irrigation practices throughout the entire nursery. We conservatively estimate that this has reduced their water use by 100,000,000 gallons per year, enough water to supply about 800 households or about 2,000 people.

 

1. Project Title: Precision Irrigation and Nutrient Management for Nursery, Greenhouse and Green Roof Systems: Wireless Sensor Networks for Feedback and Feed-forward Control.

2. Funding Agency: USDA-NIFA

3. Project Award Number: SCRI 2009-51181-05768

4a. Project Funding Dollar Value: $5,161,495

4b. Project Funding Matching Amount: $5,205,172

5. Effective Project Dates: 09/01/2009 – 8/31/2014

6. Institutions and Companies Involved: University of Maryland, Carnegie Mellon Robotics Institute, University of Georgia, Colorado State University, Cornell University, Decagon Devices, Inc., Antir Software, LLC, McCorkle Nurseries

7. Congressional Districts: GA-10

8. Stakeholder and Commodity Groups Affected: Field-nursery, Container-nursery, Greenhouse

9. Project Website: View website

10. Project Director/Co-PD: Marc van Iersel

11. Project Director/Co-PD Email: mvanier@uga.edu

12. Project Director/Co-PD Phone: 706-583-0284

May
21

Weed, Water, and Nutrient Management Practices for Organic Blackberry Production


Blackberry production test plot at the Oregon State University North Willamette Research and Extension Center

Oregon’s berry crop industry is diverse and economically important. In 2011, about 23,000 acres on over 1000 family farms were harvested for a farm gate value of more than $123 M. Blackberry acreage continues to grow with new growers requiring basic information and existing growers struggling to remain economically viable in a global market. Growers require knowledge on production and physiology questions in order to make educated decisions that will improve farm profitability and sustainability. We seek to assist growers wishing to establish or transition into organic berry production make educated decisions and improve economic viability and sustainability.

To our knowledge, ours is the only organic study in the world on blackberry for processing. The long-term goal of this work is to develop best irrigation, fertigation and weed management practices in organic machine-harvested blackberry bound for processing, best management practices for fresh blackberry production, and an understanding of the healthful properties of blackberry fruit. With NIFA-OREI funding totaling $2.5 M, the support of Oregon and Washington Berry Commissions, and the Northwest Center for Small Fruits Research, we have developed organic production systems trials on organically-certified land at an OSU research station (NWREC) and at two grower-cooperator sites (in Oregon and North Carolina).

With grower input, information gained from this study is allowing us to develop an organic blackberry cost of production guide. Some of our findings will benefit all blackberry growers by promoting sustainability and environmental quality. We are gathering science-based information on the effectiveness of organic weed management techniques, the importance of post-harvest irrigation, fertigation, and primocane management on processed, machine-harvested, organic blackberries. We are also collaborating with research and extension colleagues at NCSU to develop fresh blackberry production systems and determine the effect of production system and cultivar on the healthful properties of fruit.

Weeds are a significant problem in all organic production systems. Oregon blueberry growers have readily adopted our findings in the use of landscape fabric in new plantings. Implementation of the practice has increased from less than 10% of the newly planted acres in 2006 to more than 80% of the new acreage in 2010. We will see whether blackberry growers likewise adopt this practice. Should similar positive effects of landscape fabric on plant growth and yield be noted, increased use of landscape fabric will likely lead to reduced herbicide application in organic and conventional plantings. Organic production systems are thought to be better for the environment in that use of synthetic pesticides is prohibited; run off and leaching of synthetic pesticides and fertilizers to water sources simply does not occur. This project is working with the eOrganic staff to enhance outreach and disseminate findings.

 

1. Project Title: Organic Blackberry Production Systems for Improved Yield, Fruit Quality, and Food Safety in Fresh and Processed Markets

2. Funding Agency: USDA-NIFA-OREI

3. Project Award Number: 2010-01940

4a. Project Funding Dollar Value: $2,428,677

4b. Project Funding Matching Amount: $675,437

5. Effective Project Dates: 10/1/10 – 9/30/14

6. Institutions and Companies Involved: Oregon State University; USDA-ARS (HCRU, Corvallis, OR), North Carolina State University; Littau Harvesters Inc. (Stayton, OR); Riverbend Organic Farms (Jefferson, OR), Sakuma Bros. Inc. (Burlington, WA), Small Planet Foods (Sedro-Woolley, WA), Homegrown Organic Farms (Porterville, CA), Hursts Berry Farms (Sheridan, OR), Dole, SunnyRidge Farms Inc. (Winter Haven, FL), Ayers Creek Farm (Gaston, OR), Vollmer Farms (Bunn, NC)

7. Congressional Districts: OR-005

8. Stakeholder and Commodity Groups Affected: Organic and conventional blackberry growers in the western and southeastern USA; pest management and harvester companies working with processed blackberry industries; companies manufacturing organic fertilizer, pesticide, and weed management products; berry crop fresh shipping and packing and processing companies.

9. Project Website: View website

10. Project Director/Co-PD: Dr. Bernadine Strik

11. Project Director/Co-PD Email: strikb@hort.oregonstate.edu

12. Project Director/Co-PD Phone: 541-737-5434

May
21

Organic Blueberry Production Systems in Oregon


Organic blueberry production trials at Oregon State University's North Willamette Research and Extension Center

Oregon’s berry crop industry is diverse and economically important. In 2011, about 23,000 acres on over 1000 family farms were harvested for a farm gate value of more than $123 M. Organic blueberry acreage in the USA increased from 480 acres in 2003 to 1,950 acres in 2008. Blueberry acreage continues to grow with new growers requiring basic information and existing growers struggling to remain economically viable in a global market. We seek to assist growers wishing to establish or transition into organic berry production make educated decisions and improve economic viability and sustainability.

To our knowledge, ours is the only whole systems, organically certified study in highbush blueberry in the world. The long-term goal of this work is to develop organic production systems for highbush blueberry that maximize plant growth and yield; facilitate weed, water and nutrient management; and provide economic benefit to growers. With NIFA-OREI funding totaling $494,600, the support of Oregon and Washington Berry Commissions, and the Northwest Center for Small Fruits Research, we have developed organic production systems with similar yield and production costs to conventional systems.

With grower input, information gained from this study has allowed us to develop a blueberry economics publication for organic production. Some of our findings will benefit all blueberry growers by promoting sustainability and environmental quality. The organic blueberry work already is producing short term benefits and is expected to have significant long-term benefits for growers.

Weeds are a significant problem in all organic production systems. Oregon blueberry growers have readily adopted our findings in the use of landscape fabric for weed control in new plantings. Implementation of the practice has increased from less than 10% of the newly planted acres in 2006 to more than 80% of the new acreage in 2010. The positive effects of landscape fabric on plant growth and yield will likely lead to reduced herbicide application in organic and conventional plantings alike. Organic production systems are thought to be better for the environment in that use of synthetic pesticides is prohibited; run off and leaching of synthetic pesticides and fertilizers to water sources simply does not occur. This NIFA-OREI funded work indicates greater yield from minimized fertilizer use benefiting the grower and the environment. In addition, maximizing fertilizer and irrigation efficiency will likely be of environmental benefit. This project has used eOrganic to enhance outreach and disseminate findings.

 

1. Project Title: Organic Blueberry Production Systems in Oregon

2. Funding Agency: USDA-NIFA-OREI

3. Project Award Number: 2008-513000-04443

4a. Project Funding Dollar Value: $494,578

4b. Project Funding Matching Amount: $434,722

5. Effective Project Dates: 8/15/08 – 8/14/11

6. Institutions and Companies Involved: Oregon State University; USDA-ARS (HCRU, Corvallis, OR), Riverbend Organic Farms (Jefferson, OR), Sakuma Bros. Inc. (Burlington, WA), Small Planet Foods (Sedro-Woolley, WA), Homegrown Organic Farms (Porterville, CA), Hursts Berry Farms (Sheridan, OR), Fall Creek Farm and Nursery (Lowell, OR), Oregon Blueberry Commission, PanAmerican Berry Growers (Salem, OR)

7. Congressional Districts: OR-005

8. Stakeholder and Commodity Groups Affected: Organic and conventional blueberry growers in the USA; companies manufacturing organic fertilizer, pesticide, and weed management products; berry crop fresh shipping and packing and processing companies.

9. Project Website: View website

10. Project Director/Co-PD: Dr. David Bryla; Dr. Bernadine Strik

11. Project Director/Co-PD Email: david.bryla@ars.usda.gov; strikb@hort.oregonstate.edu

12. Project Director/Co-PD Phone: 541-738-4094 (Bryla); 541-737-5434 (Strik)

Mar
03

Locally Grown Ethnic Greens and Herbs: Demand Assessments and Production Opportunities for East Coast Farmers


Purple Amaranth - an ancient high-protein plant from South America, with leaves are among the most nutritious of vegetable greens

Hispanics and Asians living in the United States had a combined purchasing power of almost $1.5 trillion in 2009, representing a major market opportunity for farmers on the East Coast. The primary focus of this project was to analyze consumer demand for ethnic greens/herbs, understand willingness to pay a premium for fresh leafy greens/herbs, document ethnic consumers’ preferences for local produce, and better understand demographic characteristics of likely buyers. The motivation for studying demand for ethnic greens/herbs is based on size of the Asians and Hispanic immigrant population, in this region. A 2006 consumer survey of the total ethnic produce market on the East Coast was estimated at more than $1 billion. To increase profitability and sustainability, many farmers have begun growing specialty crops, to target this sizeable horticultural market.

During 2010, we conducted four online focus group sessions with consumers who identified with one of four ethnic groups of interest (Mexicans, Puerto Ricans, Asian Indians and Chinese), who identified a final list of 40 ethnic greens and herbs. Based on 2010 census data, there are 1.3 million Asian Indians, 1.2 million Chinese, about 3 million Mexicans, and 3.6 million Puerto Ricans in Washington, DC and the 16 Eastern US states covered by our study. A telephone survey instrument was developed, and a total of 1,117 interview samples were randomly collected from these target audiences. On average, Asian Indians spent $112 dollars per month; Chinese consumers spent $87 per month; Mexican consumers and Puerto Rican consumers spent $79 and $85 per month, respectively, on ethnic greens and herbs.

Based on the purchasing behavior and numbers of consumers in each of these demographics, the potential farm-gate value of these ethnic vegetables could conservatively be over $200 million per year in Washington DC and 16 US states covered by the study. Our team has utilized a number of follow-up strategies to reach potential producers and extension specialists. An online webinar was conducted by team members, during which outcomes of this survey were presented (see http://www.primetechrepair.com/symp//EthnicCrops/Ramu_Govindasamy/player.htm)
Team members have also developed a world crop website to promote outreach to clientele at http://www.worldcrops.org/

 

1. Project Title: Locally Grown Ethnic Greens and Herbs: Demand Assessments and Production Opportunities for East Coast Farmers

2. Funding Agency: USDA-NIFA

3. Project Award Number: SCRI 2009-51181-06035

4a. Project Funding Dollar Value: $1,503,166

4b. Project Funding Matching Amount: $1,503,166

5. Effective Project Dates: 09/01/2009 – 8/31/2013

6. Institutions and Companies Involved: Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, Pennsylvania State University, University of Massachusetts, University of Florida

7. Congressional Districts: NJ-06; FL-06; MA-01; PA-05

8. Stakeholder and Commodity Groups Affected: Vegetable growers; Consumers; Direct Marketers

9. Project Website: View website

10. Project Director/Co-PD: Ramu Govindasamy

11. Project Director/Co-PD Email: Govindasamy@aesop.rutgers.edu

12. Project Director/Co-PD Phone:

Nov
28

Use of Wetland Systems to Treat Nursery Runoff


A constructed wetland

Constructed wetlands filter pollutants from nursery runoff. Growers can use this technology to protect surface waters from nutrient enrichment.

More than 56.6 million acres of land were irrigated in the United States in 2007, of which 56% was irrigated by sprinkler and microirrigation systems.1  We are developing treatment technologies to cleanse irrigation runoff either before reuse for irrigation or release into the environment.  By developing constructed wetland and vegetative buffer design technologies for use as an environmental best management practice, our team will provide growers with plant-based technology to remove sediment, nutrient, pathogen, and pesticide contaminants from water.

Through collaboration among plant scientists, plant pathologists, and environmental toxicologists, with commercial nursery and greenhouse growers in GA and SC, we are designing ecological treatment systems to cleanse water.  These treatment systems rely on natural processes to remove contaminants rather than chemical treatments.  Developing this technology will increase reuse of irrigation runoff (saving potable water resources for non-irrigation uses) and increase worker safety.  Close cooperation among researchers and commercial growers takes advantage of everyone’s expertise, ensuring progress towards implementation of the science into practice.

During the past three years, we have monitored the efficacy of two constructed wetlands to facilitate removal of nutrients and pathogen contaminants from runoff.  The wetlands reduced export of total nitrogen by 69%, phosphorus by 39%, and Phytophthora spp. (a pathogen) by 80%.  Over 630,000 gallons of water flow through these wetlands each day, and an average of 143 lbs. of nitrogen and 0.12 lbs. of phosphorus are removed from runoff on a daily basis.  Given that it takes only 0.02 ppm phosphorus to contribute to nutrient enrichment and potential impairment of surface waters2, optimizing best management practices to reduce nutrient export into surface waters is critical.  This technology to filter contaminants from runoff not only helps to protect our surface waters, but can also be applied to increase re-use of irrigation runoff to save potable water sources for other uses.

 

1. Project Title: Use of Wetland Systems to Treat Nursery Runoff

2. Funding Agency: USDA-ARS-FNRI

3. Project Award Number: 6618-13000-003-02S

4a. Project Funding Dollar Value: $262,877

4b. Project Funding Matching Amount:

5. Effective Project Dates: 09/26/2007– 8/31/2012

6. Institutions and Companies Involved: Clemson University, USDA-ARS-HRL

7. Congressional Districts: SC-03, GA-02, FL-16

8. Stakeholder and Commodity Groups Affected: Container-nursery; Greenhouse

9. Project Website: View website

10. Project Director/Co-PD: Sarah White

11. Project Director/Co-PD Email: swhite4@clemson.edu

12. Project Director/Co-PD Phone: 864-656-7433 (email is preferred method of contact)

Nov
22

Hazelnut breeding for disease resistance and climate adaptation


Oregon produces 99% of US commercial hazelnuts, with farmgate sales at $60-75 million. Oregon hazelnuts attract a premium price for large nuts compared to any other production area. Commercial plantings began in 1905; the area planted to hazelnuts reached 29,000 acres in 1986 when eastern filbert blight (EFB) was found in Clackamas County, OR.

Chemical control of EFB costs $160/acre/year. Scouting and removal of infected branches is an additional $150/acre/year. Infected trees experience dramatic yield reduction as they gradually die. From 1986 to 2010, new orchards were planted (mostly ‘Lewis’) and old diseased orchards were removed, and the total acreage remained at 29,000 acres. About 70% of orchards are infected, or are close to diseased orchards.

The goal of this SCRI-funded project is to develop disease-resistant hazelnuts, develop varieties adapted to nut production in eastern North America, and develop varieties providing Midwestern growers with an additional biofuel enterprise. The ‘Gasaway’ gene confers resistance to EFB. It is fully mapped and characterized, although work continues to refine our understanding of its function. Cultivar ‘Jefferson,’ EFB resistant and valued for its large nuts, is being readily adopted.

Beginning in 2010, plantings have expanded at a rate of 3000 acres per year with availability of new resistant cultivars. Continued research will identify and study new sources of resistance, and use them to develop new cultivars with stable resistance. Hazelnuts provide an alternative enterprise to the Willamette Valley’s grass seed growers, who continue to suffer from stagnant markets since the fall of the housing market in 2008. In a fully establishment orchard, EFB resistant trees return $1,940 per acre over cash costs to the grower, as compared to -$3,014 for the EFB susceptible planting, a difference in cumulative cash flow of $4,954 per acre. China is the principal export market for US hazelnuts.

 

1. Project Title: Expansion of hazelnut production, feedstock, and biofuel potential through breeding for disease resistance and climate adaptation

2. Funding Agency: USDA NIFA SCRI

3. Project Award Number: 2009-51181-06028

4a. Project Funding Dollar Value: $1,392,933

4b. Project Funding Matching Amount: 100%

5. Effective Project Dates: 9/1/03 – 8/31/12

6. Institutions and Companies Involved: Oregon State University Rutgers University of Nebraska Arbor Day Foundation

7. Congressional Districts: OR 1, OR3, OR 4, OR 5, NJ 6, NB 1

8. Stakeholder and Commodity Groups Affected: Hazelnut

9. Project Website: View website

10. Project Director/Co-PD: Shawn Mehlenbacher

11. Project Director/Co-PD Email: mehlenbs@hort.oregonstate.edu

12. Project Director/Co-PD Phone: 541-737-5467 (email contact much preferred)

Older posts «